Friday, May 13, 2016

Arab Women and the War On Terror

On 4 August, 2010 cover of Time magazine features an Afghan girl with her nose and ear sliced off, under the heading, “What happens if we leave Afghanistan?” The ideological meaning of the cover is self-explanatory, the war on terror is also to liberate Muslim women of oppressive Arab and Islamic ruling.
Arab women have suffered from negative stereotyping in U.S for more than 100 years, but more so after 9/11. This resulted in most Americans seeing the Arab culture as dangerous and oppressive. I will be examining how, when and why these stereotypes have emerged in the media.
Stereotypes are a set of beliefs are about the characteristic of a people. They are product of the process of categorization. Individual is seen as member of a category to which stereotypes can apply, when we categorize. When we categorize people, we draw inferences about them. These inferences are based on knowledge and experience. This prior knowledge is called schema. Schema plays a critical role in Arab stereotypes. Although they all us to quickly make judgment and respond, they play a key role in maintaining stereotypes of Arabs.
Stereotypes are easy to form and harder to change. Stereotypes about Arabs are ingrained in American psyche, recreated and conveyed through cultural means of schooling, parenting, and media. Arab stereotypes have been around for centuries, but the media helps intensify, circulate and create new stereotypes. To see how stereotypes have evolved, one needs to study the work of Edward Said, Orientalism. Orientalism is a way of seeing the Arab world that exaggerates and distorts the differences between east and west. According to Said, orientalism dates back to the time of colonization of the Arab world. Orientalism provided a way of the west to see Arab world as backward, needing of intervention and rescue. Examples of Orientalism include European paintings depicting Arab women as exotic creatures with strange social customs. They are eroticized for the viewing pleasure of European. World fair in Chicago and St. Louis reinforced orientalism to United States. There was a crossing over form European orientalism to American orientalism.
American orientalism maintained the stereotypes of the Arab people as violent, backward and sexually depraved, strengthened by the media in the 20th century. Said claims that after Islam’s conquest of Syria, Persia, North Africa and Egypt Islam came to represent terror and destruction. The world was divided into “ours” and “theirs”. Fear of the orient grew in the 20th century’s dominion over the east weakened.
The negative stereotypes were recreated after 9/11. Arabs came to be seen as bombers, belly dancers, and billionaires, bad guys in movies, literature and newspapers. Because of the awareness of Islamphobia and ethnic stereotyping, positive stereotypes have emerged that depict Arabs as victims of hate and prejudice, while at the same time justifying and providing reasons for such hate. Popular movies and newspapers continue to depict Arabs negatively. One of the political cartoons depicts Arab women as suicide bombers, veiled in black burqa with a explosives vest. The message being that both Arab muslim men and women can’t be trusted. They are barbaric, violent race that treats their women as secondary.
            Some of the stereotypes of Arab women include belly dancers and women clad in burqa. Arab women in the Arab television appear with very little clothing, and in sexually provocative ways, while in the western media continue to depict the Arab women in burqa, so it can jump on the band wagon of humanity, with a call to rid her of her oppressive clothing. The other side of this coin embraces the eroticization and exoticism of the women. Arab world and western world differ in their political and social agenda that continues to shape the media’s choice in how the Arab women are depicted in an attempt to form an impression of the viewer that such stereotypes are the norm.
            Western audiences have been primed with the incessant flow of images of the Arab women in black tents that whenever they hear the term, “Muslim Women” that is the image  conjured  in western minds. A simple Google search of the term “Muslim Women” will bring up images of Muslim women in black burqas. One of the cover stories for Foreign Policy was, “Why do they hate us?” depicting a woman covered in black body paint, with only her eyes showing. The article explores Islamic fundamentalism in the Arab world, only highlights the worst form of extremism in the Arab countries, concluding that the Arab culture is inherently evil, and all Arab men hate their women. The Arab women has become the field of struggle for power by contested ideologies of the Arab world and the west.
            Such depictions deprive the Arab women of the diversity of culture, heritage and experiences. Defying such stereotypes of oppressed women, Arab women made their presence felt in the Arab spring. The Arab spring toppled dictatorship in Egypt, Tunisia, and other countries. The women widely participated in protests, demonstrations, and on social media networking.
Political scientists have found that gender gaps in political participation exists in all societies, with the women being less active in traditional forms of activism. This gender gap is closing with science, modernization, secularization and with a younger generation in Arab countries.
            Gallup study that 30% of Egypt revolutionary protestors and driving factors were women. Their presence brought attention to the opposition actions. In the Arab spring women were active in providing medical care, protesting along with men on streets, networking on social media and blogging the events of Arab spring.
            Whether women are being depicted as burqa clad or wearing very little clothing, these are both sides of the same coin. Both provide leverage for the war on terror that is very much a gendered war, with the female body being the contested field for an ideological warfare.
      


Thursday, January 21, 2016

Necessary Silence

     Leadership today is solely equivalent with social dominance and extroversion, but it's leadership in solitude that has historically led to the greatest inventions and revolutionary ideas.
     Solitude becomes necessary for rearranging any existing field of knowledge or creating new field of thought. Contemporary society is based on group think, while most creatives and inventors find solitude necessary for optimal performance
      I support the open source culture and crowdsourcing platforms, but these platforms require the work of introverts to truly make it flourish. The rules of the game that apply online don't translate so neatly into real life. The same people thriving on these platforms of open source culture, if grouped in a single room would fail to create anything revolutionary. Group think is not always the solution for every circumstance.